February 29, 2008
Cybermouth: A Closer Look
February 19, 2008
The Good Dentist: Accommodating all Patients

Visiting the dentist on a regular basis is not always easy for a majority of people. For some it is too costly, others do not have time, many fear going to the dentist all together, and some are simply unreliable. As I get closer and closer to entering my profession as a dentist, I have realized that it is not only important to be technically proficient and knowledgeable about multiple disease states, but it is also imperative to acquire a knack in order to cater to a broad spectrum of patients. After entering the blogosphere for the first time, it was refreshing to see that several dentists and organizations are now attempting to accommodate all of their patients through a variety of ways. Richmond Dental Implants was the first blog I came across, and I examined the post, “Sedation Dentistry in Richmond,” published by Dr. Scott Gore D.D.S. He is a graduate of the Medical College of Virginia,

Comment (Sedation Dentistry in
It seems to me that whenever I mention my aspirations of becoming a dentist to those who ask about my future career plans, the majority cringe. At least at some point in your career, I am sure you have also experienced family, friends, and even patients telling you, “I hate going to the dentist!” or something along those lines. As you mention in your post, people avoid the dentist for a number of reasons: some are too busy to get to the dentist regularly, others get physically sick, some people have severe back and neck pain that make sitting in a chair uncomfortable, and several get claustrophobic or anxious, to name a few. Although my father is not a dentist, he is a very successful gynecologist, and has demonstrated to me over the years how very important it is to find a way to accommodate all types of patients. What is intriguing to me about your article is that sedation dentistry seems to be a technique that can help patients who dread a trip to the dentist for a variety of reasons. Being naïve in the field of dentistry at this point, I have very little knowledge about sedation dentistry. You do mention it involves taking pills, that the patient is not asleep, and that it promotes relaxation. Having an interest in medicine as well, and to ensure a patient’s well being, I would like to know more about the composition of these pills, side effects, and who specifically may or may not benefit from this new technique. As you have probably experienced in your practice, children especially tend to have a difficult time at the dentist. With this in mind, I am interested in knowing if sedation dentistry is safe for the younger patient, and if this technique may affect them differently than it would affect adults. Finally, you mention it allows you to do several procedures in one sitting and may shorten recovery time for the patient. Fewer trips to the dentist and a less painful and shorter recovery time are aspects of sedation dentistry that would clearly be appealing to all people. With the significance of being able to accommodate a wide variety of patients, do you feel that sedation dentistry may be the way of the future in dental medicine for everyone? Thank you for your time.
Comment (USC School of Dentistry Student’s Check Local Children’s Hygiene):
Recently, I published a post that discusses how the mouth may be used as a diagnostic tool for diagnosing other systemic diseases. When I came across your post, I found it quite interesting that the number one reason why kids from the
February 8, 2008
The Mouth: A Diagnostic Tool
According to the American Cancer Society, the second leading cause of death among American women today is breast cancer. In order to detect cysts, calcifications and tumors within the breast, typically women over the age of 35 make a trip to their OBGYN to receive a yearly mammogram. However, Chyke A. Doubeni, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Massachusetts Medical Center claims that, "Despite their [women] significant risk for development of a new breast tumor, even women who comply with a recommended yearly mammogram gradually fall by the wayside over the years." On the other hand, in a recent experiment at the
An analysis of the saliva may eventually help gynecologists to also detect other disease states. A study conducted at the e part of a larger investigation involving risk factors for osteoporosis and oral bone loss (see picture to left), were examined for specific periodontal pathogens, mainly P. gigivalis and T. forsynthesis. These two pathogens were found to infect 15.1 percent and 37.9 percent of these women. In addition, two other pathogens, P. intermedia and C. rectus, were found in 43.4 percent and 17.4 percent of women. If indeed these oral pathogens are related to bone loss in the mouth, it is conceivable that this may prove to be an easy, reasonably priced, and risk free test that may help in the diagnosis of systemic osteoporosis. It is well known that obese women compared to women with normal BMIs have a lower risk of developing osteoporosis due to effects of estrogen and weight bearing on bone preservation. However, this study also found that the greatest risk for oral bone loss was found in overweight women, supported by a three-fold increase. These seemingly contradicting discoveries only support the fact that further research needs to be done to elucidate the seemingly conflicting results. Since the cost of the current bone density test used by gynecologists is so significant, if further investigation of this new diagnostic tool could prove to help predict systemic osteoporosis, health care costs could be decreased dramatically.
Salivary analysis could also help infectious disease specialists diagnose viral infections. Although typically these viruses are found through examination of blood samples, Farmer, Clewley, Griffiths, and Johnson of the U.S. National Institute of Health claim that, "The sensitivity of the saliva Murex GACELISA is the same as the routine serum testing assay." For example, salivary IgA levels tend to decline as an HIV patient becomes symptomatic. Therefore, it may be that the detection of IgA antibody to HIV (see picture to right) in saliva may indicate the progression of the HIV infection. Similar studies have used saliva samples as a successful tool for diagnosis of hepatitis A and hepatitis B, based on the levels of IgM antibodies in saliva. In particular, it has been found that low levels of IgM are associated with vaccine-induced immunity. Just as the comparison of serum and saliva levels of antibody to HIV have been directly correlated, so have the levels of antibody for hepatitis (sensitivity = 98.7% and specificity = 99.6%). Since it has been discovered that in certain cases saliva and serum analysis are equally effective in the diagnoses of some diseases, this new technique may be advantageous. This needle-less method of analysis is not only simple and cost effective, but it is also beneficial to those patients, like hemophiliacs and drug users, who have difficulty in accessing peripheral blood.
Saliva samples are also being used to predict and monitor drug and hormone levels, certain autoimmune diseases, and hereditary diseases like cystic fibrosis. Still, many physicians are hesitant to believe that it could ever truly be considered a valid method for accurately predicting systemic diseases. For instance, Irwin Mandel, a professor emeritus of Columbia University, believes that, "Saliva doesn't have the drama of blood and the salivary glands are only lowly excretory organs." Although plenty of further research is necessary to make this new diagnostic tool legitimate, it is still very encouraging to believe that in the very near future, health care providers may have a painless, efficient, and cost effective way for detecting several of today’s most common diseases. After all, swabs of certain body surfaces that were at one point thought to be unreliable have proven to save lives, and the classic example is George Papanicolaou’s Pap Smear.